Check the background of this firm on FINRA BrokerCheck
Home About Blog Contact
← Back to Blog

Market Outlook

October

Monthly Market Commentary

Ketu Desai October 01, 2026

Now is a great time to work with i-squared! You will get a high-touch, well-researched, customized portfolio. All done with a client-first approach, integrity, and independence. Feel free to reach out.

As a reminder:

  • i-squared named Five-Star Advisor for 2023, 2024, 2025, check out this short video: CLICK HERE
  • i-squared ranked Top 20 Wealth Management Firm in the US, click HERE
  • Now offering a customized AI Opportunities Strategy, AI looks like the next mega-cycle in investing. McKinsey estimates that it could be worth $4.4 trillion annually. Marc Andreessen says, "AI is quite possibly the most important – and best – thing our civilization has ever created, certainly on par with electricity and microchips, and probably beyond those." please reach out for more details on AI Strategy

i-squared Wealth Management Inc. Market Update

i-squared Wealth Management Inc. Market Update — index levels and changes with P/E estimates

September could be remembered as the month that two important mistakes were made. The first by the Fed. The Fed raised rates with the market odds that this will be a hiking cycle. While the hike helps the new Fed Chair with credibility, the hike is unlikely to have a meaningful impact on inflation. The inflation problem is a supply problem. Supply of oil, food, and other commodities due to the two wars. Supply of semiconductors and other AI infrastructure. Supply of housing. Rate hikes won’t solve these issues. If anything, rate hikes raise financing costs that prevent new supply from coming. Rate hikes flatten the yield curve, which hurts banking activity, especially at small and mid-sized regional banks. The yield curve has flattened considerably recently. We are not that far away from it inverting, which would send a clear message that the Fed has made a mistake.

Market Implied Number of Rate Hikes in 2026, based on Fed Funds futures
It’s Not About Inflation — 10-year Treasury yield, real yield and inflation breakeven

Breakeven rates across the curve have moderated, after peaking in early May. The 5YR breakeven rate is 2.3%, not far from the 2% target. Core PCE over the last three months is running at the 2% target. Core PCE is expected to decline meaningfully next year. One-time factors from portfolio management, software, war and tariff impacts peaked this summer and are expected to roll-off. As oil and diesel cool off, it will have a meaningful impact on inflation. The stock market is often the best economist. It is sending a clear message that hikes are crushing housing, retail, banks, transports, and consumer discretionary. Even names such as Walmart, Costco, and McDonalds are down nearly 20% from their highs. Other, more discretionary areas such as cruise liners, restaurants, homebuilders, and retailers are down much more.

The Early-Warning Groups — industry groups against the benchmark
Exhibit 1: Core PCE inflation and effects of temporary factors on year-over-year core PCE inflation

The other mistake looks to be from frontier AI lab executives making doomsday predictions. These warnings could be for commercial reasons. Reasons such as regulatory capture, liability protection, and burden of care. It is clear that they are losing share to open-source models. They are realizing that they don’t have much of a moat. These types of doomsday warnings will and already have hurt them. Anthropic is losing public trust very quickly. This is ultimately a trust business. Recent polling says that just five percent of people trust Anthropic with their passwords. Many corporations will be hesitant to hand over their data to Anthropic. Latham & Watkins, the nation's second-largest law firm, bought its own Nvidia GPU servers and started customizing its own AI models not using OpenAI or Anthropic. The firm's chief information officer said they don't want to put their client information on any cloud vendor's platform.

Token usage has exploded, and open-weight models have taken share
Trust Issues — poll respondents who said they trusted tech platforms with passwords

Tighter monetary policy, distrust of frontier labs, and the release of Meta’s Muse is driving investor capital to large cap tech names. Narrow breadth has benefited market-cap-weighted indices to the detriment of equal weight and smaller caps. The market cap weighted S&P has outperformed both equal weight and small caps by nearly 5% over the past month. Investors prefer the secular growth of large cap tech and AI infrastructure when the Fed is in a hiking cycle. An additional headwind for many of the names outside of tech is that they could be a candidate for disruption from consumer AI agents. Names across insurance, travel, banks, brokerage firms, and retail sold-off upon the release of Muse. Valuation for the market cap weighted S&P is not demanding. The gains for the year have been entirely through earnings growth. The multiple is down 13% for the year, while margins are near 17%, an all-time high. The ratio of P/E to margins is at levels of major bottoms such as in 2008, 2011, 2018 and 2022. The PEG ratio is the lowest in 30-years, meaning you are not paying much for the earnings growth.

S&P 500 Valuation: PEG ratio (weekly)
Breaking Down S&P 500 Sector Returns — year-to-date earnings and multiple contribution

The frontier labs and companies such as Google and Meta will battle to be the preferred consumer AI agent. The ultimate winner will be the semiconductor companies. There simply isn’t enough compute to fully utilize consumer agents for large user bases such as from Meta. Bank of America expects the semiconductor industry to double by 2030. Citi expects the memory undersupply to last until 2031. Goldman expects the hyperscalers to increase capex by 54% in 2027, a significant amount of which will go to semiconductors. Analysts expect semiconductor earnings to grow 73.5% in 2027 with 51.2% margins. Korean customs data offer the earliest and cleanest reading on global technology demand. The numbers are astounding. The latest semiconductor exports surged 259.4% from a year earlier! Semiconductors continue to trade below a market multiple. Most trade below a 1.0 PEG ratio. Shareholder return of capital is high. Nvidia announced the largest buyback in history. Expect a large one from Micron in December. Positioning has been cleaned up from the Situational Awareness led sell-off over the summer. Semis have built a beautiful base that they are ready to breakout from. The bottom line is that the AI buildout is the largest capital expenditure in history and semiconductors are one of the biggest beneficiaries.

Hyperscaler FCF Has Become Semiconductor FCF
Every Compute Cycle Is Bigger Than The Previous One
Global semiconductors 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio

Looking forward the market will focus on earnings, geopolitics, AI, yields, and a Fed meeting.

Disclosure

The commentary on BLOG reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints and analyses of the i-squared Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by i-squared Wealth Management or performance returns of any i-squared Wealth Management client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing in this commentary constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. i-squared Wealth Management manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.Services offered through i-squared Wealth Management Inc, a Registered Investment Adviser. This message and any attachments contain information which may be confidential and/or privileged and is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, copying, distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please (i) notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone and (ii) destroy all copies of this message. If you do not wish to receive marketing emails from this sender, please send an email to ketu@isquaredwealth.com. This message and any attachments contain information which may be confidential and/or privileged and is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, copying, distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please (i) notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone and (ii) destroy all copies of this message. If you do not wish to receive marketing emails from this sender, please send an email to ketu@isquaredwealth.com. The top 10 companies in this Financial Services Review list are selected purely based on merit through an extensive selection process. However, some of the companies in the list have purchased the reprint rights from Financial Services Review. If you engage in services with these companies through our endorsement referenced in our posts and links, please be advised that these are sponsored posts. Financial Services Review is not a client of these companies and does not utilize the investment advisory services offered by them, as an SEC-registered investment adviser. A conflict of interest may exist due to our compensation arrangement with these companies, as a publisher. This award was issued on by Five Star Professional (FSP), fee paid for use of marketing materials. Self-completed questionnaire was used for rating. This rating is not related to the quality of the investment advice and based solely on the disclosed criteria. 6,515 New Jersey-area wealth managers were considered for the award; 462 (7% of candidates) were named 2024 Five Star Wealth Managers. The following prior year statistics use this format: YEAR: # Considered, # Winners, % of candidates, Issued Date, Research Period. 2023: 6,606, 407, 6%, 12/1/22, 3/21/22 - 10/18/22; 2022: 6380, 431, 7%, 12/1/21, 4/12/21 - 10/15/21; 6123, 459, 7%, 12/1/20, 3/30/20 - 10/23/20; 2020: 6210, 480, 8%, 12/1/19, 3/1/19 - 10/16/19; 2019: 6097, 477, 8%, 12/1/18, 3/21/18 - 10/12/18; 2018: 4383, 415, 9%, 12/1/17, 2/21/17 - 10/12/17; 2017: 3868, 664, 17%, 11/1/16, 2/25/16 - 10/7/16; 2016: 4143, 626, 15%, 11/1/15, 4/15/15 - 10/16/15; 2015: 5063, 672, 13%, 12/1/14, 4/15/14 - 10/16/14; 2014: 3315, 646, 19%, 12/1/13, 4/15/13 - 10/16/13; 2013: 4049, 733, 18%, 12/1/12, 4/15/12 - 10/16/12; 2012: 1312, 400, 30%, 11/1/11, 4/15/11 - 10/16/11. Wealth managers do not pay a fee to be considered or placed on the final list of Five Star Wealth Managers. The award is based on 10 objective criteria. Eligibility criteria - required: 1. Credentialed as a registered investment adviser (RIA) or a registered investment adviser representative; 2. Actively licensed as a RIA or as a principal of a registered investment adviser firm for a minimum of 5 years; 3. Favorable regulatory and complaint history review (As defined by FSP, the wealth manager has not; A. Been subject to a regulatory action that resulted in a license being suspended or revoked, or payment of a fine; B. Had more than a total of three settled or pending complaints filed against them and/or a total of five settled, pending, dismissed or denied complaints with any regulatory authority or FSP’s consumer complaint process. Unfavorable feedback may have been discovered through a check of complaints registered with a regulatory authority or complaints registered through FSP’s consumer complaint process; feedback may not be representative of any one client’s experience; C. Individually contributed to a financial settlement of a customer complaint; D. Filed for personal bankruptcy within the past 11 years; E. Been terminated from a financial services firm within the past 11 years; F. Been convicted of a felony); 4. Fulfilled their firm review based on internal standards; 5. Accepting new clients. Evaluation criteria - considered: 6. One-year client retention rate; 7. Five-year client retention rate; 8. Non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered; 9. Number of client households served; 10. Education and professional designations. FSP does not evaluate quality of services provided to clients. The award is not indicative of the wealth manager’s future performance. Wealth managers may or may not use discretion in their practice and therefore may not manage their clients’ assets. The inclusion of a wealth manager on the Five Star Wealth Manager list should not be construed as an endorsement of the wealth manager by FSP or this publication. Working with a Five Star Wealth Manager or any wealth manager is no guarantee as to future investment success, nor is there any guarantee that the selected wealth managers will be awarded this accomplishment by FSP in the future. Visit www.fivestarprofessional.com.